With the recent rebranding and as reasonreact seems to be part of the rescript ecosystem, will ReasonReact be renamed to something like RescriptReact?
2 Likes
My vote is simply ReReact 
Edit: Maybe ResReact… but that’s not as much fun 
2 Likes
yup I thought about ReReact, it’s cleaner, but probably not so clear. There are also some reason libraries named re-xxxx too which may be confusing.
1 Like
What about ReactRS or React.rs? This would be a logical complement to ReactJS/React.js, but I can also see how this could be too confusingly similar. (And it seems like the default name for the JavaScript version is React, without the JS.)
A downside which comes to my mind is that rust files already have this extension 
File extension being more recently .res, React.res ?
It’s even more a generic problem: how to name rescript package?
Currently for React Native we used reason-* but maybe we should focus on a dedicated rescript focused naming indeed.
2 Likes
Resact. 
2 Likes
Resact
Not a chance, lol.
But as for naming conventions for ReScript packages on Github/NPM, I seem to recall a discussion about it in which most folks preferred the rescript- prefix. I tend to agree with that idea. At least it’s unambiguous…
Probably @rickyvetter’s call, but I really like the sound of rescript-react as well!
Related discussion: Naming standard for new binding projects?
8 Likes